Domestic and Global Security Threats

Current domestic and universe of discourse-wide security threats The impact on The North Atlantic Treaty presidency (NATO) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was formed to cope with the challenges of a bipolar world. However, todays international environment faces multi-polar challenges from non- put forward actors much(prenominal)(prenominal) as terrorists. Threats once considered domestic concerns now affect the world, deal spherical thawing and the impoverishment to rebuild the infrastructure of unstable states such as Afghanistan and Bosnia.The worldwideisation of modern society has meant the globalization of modern technological threats, including cyberterrorism, as intumesce as increased international competition for scarce energy resources. whole of these problems affect NATO members but cannot be addressed with a regionally particular focus. To create a more secure world NATO go away withdraw to start working in partnership with other multilateral o rganizations, like the UN, if it hopes to find effective permanent solutions to the security challenges facing the world.Although NATOs presence is much a condition of success, it is progressively insufficient by itself when dealing with global security (Goldschmidt 2009). domestic state concerns, such as internal instability and a lack of resources can devour global repercussions. Domestic concerns Domestic quietudekeeping in Afghanistan and global warming Because of the terrorist threat frustrated to NATO nations by terrorist non-state actors harbored in Afghanistan, NATO cannot shirk the critical role it must play in creating a more stable governance, despite Afghanistans non-European location.In Afghanistan, there is a need for a coordinated effort with culture and reconstruction agencies. NATO presently must play both a security and nation-building role. It was not knowing for the latter, and cannot hope to create the conditions for host withdrawal without a concert ed development effort with other regional and international organizations such as the get together Nations (Goldschmidt 2009).Recently, NATO repository General Anders Fogh Rasmussen stated that while Afghanistan security and internal unity is still challenging and Afghanistan will likely face security threats for historic period to come, NATO alliance forces within the nation father begun transferring security responsibilities to the Afghan government and can begin a slow withdrawal (Fedynsky 2010). Afghanistan security will uphold of grave concern for the Alliance, but the approach taken by NATO has been seen as a useful template for its future 21st light speed fforts. Said Secretary General Rasmussen It will not be a run for the exitWhat will happen is that we hand over kick in responsibility to the Afghans, and our soldiers will then move into a more validatory role. But I foresee that the Afghan security forces will need our supportive assistance for quite some time (Fe dynsky 2010). NATO will increasingly assume the role, suggests Rasmussen, of a peacekeeping forcekeeping the domestic peace for Afghanistan in the interests of global peace.Global warming is of grave concern for all of NATO members, presumption that wars for the earths scarce energy resources can become a fertile source of interstate conflict. Nations with historical animosity to NATO members, such as those in the Persian Gulf, often harbor the greatest reserves of the worlds fossil fuels. Climate change can also proceeds in critical reductions in the food supply and politically destabilizing earthy disasters. Global warming has steady intensified competition for rule Russia, the US, Canada, Norway and Denmark have all been attracted to the energy supply in the Arctic.Relations between these states has intensified later on evidence revealed that global warming was melting the polar ice making, regain to the energy supplies easier as jurisdiction over the region is still under (a) dispute (Russia, Press TV, 2009). Climate change could confront us with a whole range of unpleasant developments developments which no single nation state has the power to contain. dwindling water and food supplies, global warming, and batch migration cause international tensions. Climate change will sharpen the competition over resources, notably water.It will increase the risks to coastal regions. It will provoke disputes over territory and farming land. It will spur migration and it will make fragile states even more fragile warned NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer (Waterfield 2008). Unspoken by Scheffer was the fact that Russia aims to be among the worlds top five economies in medium bourn and has a strong reliance on natural energy supplies such as oil and gas and a strong interest in expanding its reserves (Russia, Press TV, 2009).Global concerns Russia, missile shields and cyberterrorism Thus domestic concerns such as internal instability and even energy sca rcity have global repercussions that affect NATO nations. That is why, despite the end of the Cold War, tensions between NATO member and non-member nations remain bubbling so close to the surface. It has not been forgotten by the Russian leadership that NATO was founded to address the security concerns raised by the now-defunct institutions of the Soviet Federal and the Warsaw Pact.Fears of Star Wars shield defense systems were reignited in March when Secretary General Rasmussen, warning of the looming threat of weapons of mass destruction, made a plate for a missile shield system for all NATO alliance states against outlaw(a) weapons and the missiles that they could carryShould Iran produce intermediate- and intercontinental-range missilesthe whole of the European continent, as well as all of Russia would be in range, he stated (Brunnstrom 2010).Rasmussens deal mention of Russia as a potential target for rogue states and terrorist organizations did bantam to allay the Russias fears that a NATO missile shield system would pose a threat to its security. In 2009, before the US announced its renunciation of a missile defense system in the Czech Republic, a national security document released by Moscow described the US and NATO as major threats to the security of the world and Russia (Russia, Press TV, 2009). Along with its disputes with Russia, cyberterrorism and terrorism have been pressing concerns in framing NATOs global agenda for the future.The well-nigh visible aspect of NATOs anti-terrorist campaign has been in terms of its armed services capacity through efforts such as Operation Active try (OAE), a maritime surveillance operation led by NATOs naval forces to undertake anti-terrorist patrol, escort and compliant boarding in the Mediterranean, as well as NATO policing assistance protecting the public during high-profile events such as the Olympics and other international sporting events (Topic Terrorism, NATO, 2010).NATO has also made either effor t to deploy new technology in its efforts to subvert terrorist threats such as its exculpation Against Terrorism Program of Work (DAT POW) which created the precision drop off technology currently used in Afghanistan. Since 2007 cyber attacks in Estonia swamped government websites presently after the Estonian government challenged the Russian government regarding the possession of a national monument, NATOs aw arness has been heightened about the security risks posed by cyberterrorism. The protection of NATOs key information systems in general, and cyber defense in particular, are integral parts of the functions of the Alliance (Topic Terrorism, NATO, 2010). In addition to specifically-coordinated military efforts, NATO has attempted to promote information sharing between member nations regarding terrorist threats and counter-terrorist efforts.However, the caution of hostilities between NATO and Russia continues to be of concern, given Russias fears of NATO missile defense syste ms, Russias desire to expand its territorial outreach for energy reserves, and Russias lack of willingness to move in information exchanges with the Alliance. Russia is a critical partner in engagement global warming and terrorism, particularly because of its size, resources, and the fact that many cyber attacks have been traced to Russia.Building stronger relationships with Russia without agree NATOs domestic and global agenda will be a critical challenge for the Alliance in the 21st century.Works CitedBrunnstrom, David. Missile Defense Needed Against Growing Threat, NATO Chief Says. Reuters. March 26, 2009. whitethorn 14, 2010. http//www. globalsecuritynewswire. org/gsn/nw_20100326_9638. php Fedynsky, Peter. NATO to Transfer security system Tasks to Afghan Government. Global Security. April 23, 2010. whitethorn 14, 2010. http//www. globalsecurity. org/military/library/news/2010/04/mil-100423-voa01. htm Goldschmidt, Pierre. Garry Hindle, R. Andreas Kraemer, Fabrice Pothier, Ja mie Shea, Michael Stopford , Ashley J. Tellis & support Tigner. The Next Generation of Security Threats Reprogramming NATO? Carnegie Mellon Europe. February 24, 2009. May 14, 2010. http//carnegieeurope. eu/events/? fa=1255 Russia US, NATO main threats to global security. Press TV. May 13, 2009. May 14, 2010. http//www. presstv. ir/detail. aspx? id=94616ionid=351020602 Topic Terrorism NATO. 2001. May 14, 2010. http//www. nato. int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48801. htm Waterfield, Bruno. NATO Chief warns of climate change developments. The Daily Telegraph. 2008. May 14, 2010. http//www. nysun. com/foreign/nato-chief-warns-of-climate-change-developments/79215/