This is an anylazation of the poet rumi's styel and how his phrasing and other components of his writting affect the way that it is visualized in the eyes of the reader

The first poem by Rumi that I read was title An Empty Garlic. The title threw me off at first, since it goes into this orpine thing ab start an old woman, who the narrator is nerve-racking to discourage his fri sack from going after. Tasteless fig, fold over fold, release as dry-rotten garlic. This line finally make the title hedge in through the piece, which tied up a loose sack for me. I kind of agree with Rumi, though how could a person desire a woman that is divulged by this character mark? Think or so how rancid food becomes formerly it has begun to rot. Its disgusting. personally I dont think I could ever describe separate human being as dry-rotten garlic unless that person antecedently antagonized me. If he really thinks of this woman that way, then he should niche up those opinions and let his friend find out on his own. One mans trash is another mans treasure. Also Rumi writes nearly how she has this other man trapped; yet her body is a bleak wasteland. Just because her body is not great, it says nothing about the detail that she could possibly have a loving compassionate tone and a great mind. So is Rumi leaving it that authorise should be based on looks?

I think it is much believable that he in fact twisted his contentedness to exploit that option sound worse than it would if he lonesome(prenominal) made a reference to it. You miss the garden, because you expect a slight fig from a random tree. In this iterate Rumi is severe to explain to his friend that he is almost blow his love on this one woman. I understand the period of time Rumi is trying to make, an d that is that if a person is going to miss ! their life... If you want to discover a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper