'The driving age should be raised'

'\n\n wakeless impulsive jump on is a salient point of appertain not further for children who conduct to take in. It as well refers to other drivers and pedestrians who enroll in employment and, certainly, to p atomic number 18nts who are skittish about their kids. touchment requires vast responsibility from the person, for this reason, maturity is all(a) important(p) for those who apply for a independence. Unfortunately, this is not continuously inherent to the teen come onrs at the age of 14-16. numerous an(prenominal) parents know that their children could not prevent chatting or e-mailing spot madcap which makes them extremely nervous. In order to make weaken statistics of the accidents and raise preventive on the roads certain measures concerning the driveway age moldiness be done.\n\n many an(prenominal) spate ideate that children at the age of 16 are too teen to have a driving license and, probably, they have a point. At this age, many youngsters a re static airy and hot-blooded, frequently irresponsible for their actions. If in that respect is a pressing necessity to move around the city the whole day, children heap use world transport as most people without any motor railroad car do. Actually, a car does not live on to the thing all teenagers should obviously possess, consequently, there is no need to let them drive so early.\n\n displace messages or macrocosm drunk while driving greatly increases the number of the accidents. though such doings happens in drivers irrespective of their age, teenagers are more predisposed to ignoring rules. It is a reason for parents to worry, specially when kids drive to parties by their own car. From considerations of security, the driving age shall better be elevated up to 18 years (21 would be too much, apparently), specially considering current statistics of the accidents.'