Food Inc Essay Example for Free

Food Inc EssayHow is the text you squander studied in class constructed to portray certain ideas? Documentaries ar usually constructed to portray one raze of view, whether it is a negative or positive point of view. Food Inc directed by Robert Kenner, presents a umteen ideas about how the straightaway sustenance industry is affecting the ways in which Americans eat. They do this by viewing one perspective instead of both. Food Inc doesnt explore in to detail the positive aspects of fast diet they are just focusing on the negative. They construct the documentary using techniques such as expert doctrines, Interviews and statistics to present certain ideas throughout the documentary. The main idea explored throughout the documentary was the fleshly rigor caused by humans due to modifying the development of animals. They ways in which they present this ideas is mainly through footage of the animals scathe and the juxtaposition of the animals before they were modified and how the animals are now.The footage of the crowded cows helpless and unable to move creates a setting which portrays a negative feel and creatively making us feel sympathetic towards the animals. The shots of the chickens non being able to walk due to the genetic modifications of the animal, creates the idea of humans purposely provoking animal cruelty. They are changing the ways in which an animal develops for their own needs and generally to make much money. This is clearly shown through the juxtaposition of the old chicken and the new chicken.This Juxtaposition makes us question how it is potential to grow a chicken in half the time yet be double the sizing? It therefore makes the documentary more engaging as we are starting to question the farmers ourselves and therefore are dragged into believing what the documentary is trying to portray. Another idea explored in the documentary Food Inc is the constant run afoul of the prices of healthy foods compared to the prices in fast food restaurants.The ways in which Robert Kenner has constructed the documentary to perceive the fast food outlets being cheaper is through an interview with the Gonzalez family. They are an average sized American family who eat fast food due to their financial status. Kenner used the juxtaposition of the price of a meal at McDonalds to buying a meal at the supermarkets. At McDonalds the Gonzalez family can buy a burger and drink each for 11$, they accordingly show you the Gonzalez family inside a grocery store struggling to buy a lettuce for under 2$ which worked out to be the cost of their whole meal at McDonalds.This makes believe what Kenner is trying to portray and are drawn into believing that fast food is always cheaper than the groceries. However we are not given both cheap healthy displays in the supermarket, instead given with cheap unhealthy items such as 99 cent cokes. Kenner has purposely portrayed the unhealthy items in a negative way to create an opinion that we ar e being forced in to fast food rather than having the choice of fast food.